home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
102191
/
1021202.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-02-26
|
6KB
|
128 lines
<text id=91TT2336>
<title>
Oct. 21, 1991: Money Angles
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
Oct. 21, 1991 Sex, Lies & Politics
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
BUSINESS, Page 77
MONEY ANGLES
It Doesn't Take a Genius to Make a Killing
</hdr><body>
<p>By Andrew Tobias
</p>
<p> I have here three new books and an I.Q. score. The books
concern Wall Street's fallen financiers. The I.Q. belongs to
Nelson Peltz. It's not as titillating as, say, Dan Quayle's (now
there would be a columnist's dream come true), but it does hold
some interest when you consider that Nelson's net worth--which 10 years ago was roughly the size of your own, give or
take a few million--is pegged in the just released Forbes 400
at $600 million.
</p>
<p> The first book, Dennis Levine's Inside Out: An Insider's
Account of Wall Street, is junk, bound. Don't waste your time.
Instead, to learn about Levine and Ivan Boesky and particularly
about Mike Milken, read James B. Stewart's spectacular Den of
Thieves. I read it because, like most people, I wasn't entirely
sure. Was Milken, though guilty, the victim of a witch hunt over
largely technical violations? Were he and his faithful servants,
like Arthur Liman (for the defense) and Ken Lerer (for the p.r.
machine), the ones I should root for? Hah! For the first time,
it all comes clear. And guess what: the crooks were the crooks,
and the feds were the good guys after all.
</p>
<p> After reading Den of Thieves, you may in fact wonder
whether Milken, whose 10-year sentence made folks gasp, didn't
get off easy. Sure it's a waste to have a genius cleaning
toilets. But if the downside of crime is appointment to a
Treasury post, or some other challenging job, then where is the
downside really?
</p>
<p> And then there's John Rothchild's delectable Going for
Broke, due out next month. It describes how Robert Campeau, a
flamboyant French Canadian real estate developer who had
absolutely no retailing experience--who at the time of his bid
may have never even been in an Allied department store!--managed to acquire first Allied and then Federated, ultimately
controlling a U.S. retailing empire with $9 billion in sales--and $11 billion in debt. A short time later, of course,
Campeau's empire collapsed--but this is my point! Campeau went
bust; Trump's on a leash; the guy who rented the QE 2 for his
son's bar mitzvah sank; Boesky, who arrived at that bar mitzvah
in mid-cruise via friend John Mulheren's helicopter, went to
jail; so did Mulheren, briefly (but not before setting out with
an assault rifle to kill Boesky); the S&L boys are in the soup;
major insurers are having their ratings lowered; M&A star Bruce
Wasserstein looks a little silly--and you mean to tell me that
out of all this, unscathed, emerges Nelson Peltz?
</p>
<p> The image of Milken scrubbing floors and Peltz presiding
over hundreds of millions is remarkable, at the least. As
described in Connie Bruck's exceptional 1988 best seller, The
Predators' Ball, Milken made Peltz. He suggested Peltz buy giant
National Can, and then American Can, among others, and then
floated the $3 billion in junk bonds for him to do it.
Previously, Peltz had had a minor, mediocre business career. But
soon the can business entered a profitable cycle, and Peltz, and
his more highly regarded one-third partner Peter May, would be
lionized on the cover of Business Week. ("In your book," one of
Peltz's advisers told Bruck at the time, "call him Nelson the
Industrialist and make us all vomit.") In 1988 the can business
would be sold to the state-owned French giant Pechiney, yielding
Peltz, Milken et al. a nearly $1 billion profit (and spawning
its own insider-trading scandal among French government
officials).
</p>
<p> CUT TO 1986--the famed Drexel Burnham junk-bond
conference--Peltz seated at a table with Boesky and T. Boone
Pickens, among others. As Milken strides by, someone gushes,
"Congratulations, Mike. You're a genius!" "No," Milken snaps
back sarcastically, for all to hear. "Nelson Peltz here is a
genius. I'm nothing."
</p>
<p> CUT TO 1990--Chatting with a Wall Street veteran, I
mention Peltz. "What?" he asks. "Is Nelson going to jail?"
</p>
<p> "No! I don't know!" I say, alarmed he thinks I'm even
suggesting such a thing.
</p>
<p> "It would make everybody very happy," he grins.
</p>
<p> Nelson Peltz has been charged with no crimes, and I'm not
implying he has committed any. He has been indicted only by
writer Benjamin Stein in Barron's. (Stein persuasively accuses
Peltz of having skewered his fellow shareholders.) Now 49, and
married to a former Ford model, he owns an $18 million Palm
Beach estate, a 106-acre, 22-room Westchester summer place and,
I was told by his public-relations chief, is deeply concerned
with the plight of the homeless.
</p>
<p> Nelson grew up on Park Avenue, heir to a frozen-food
business in Brooklyn. In my brother's class at school, he acted
richer than the other rich kids and was known more as a snappy
dresser than a brain. Math was particularly tough for him--an
F in ninth grade and a D+ that summer; a C in 10th-grade
algebra, but an F in geometry. In the 11th grade he pulled math
up to C and C- (matching steady Cs in English), but failed
citizenship. ("And that would eliminate...," his American
history teacher paused, in a lecture about lurking communists..."YOU!" stage-whispered Nelson Peltz just a little too
loud, in the incident that may have sealed his fate.) Nelson
graduated from a different high school, then went on to, and
dropped out of, college.
</p>
<p> Needless to say, Einstein failed math, too, or so they say
(actually, this almost surely is a myth), and any number of our
most brilliant businessmen never finished college. But that
would be overstating the case with Nelson. His I.Q., at 121,
makes him brighter than 9 out of 10 boys on the bus, but still
leaves about 500 million people on the planet even brighter than
he. And perhaps more still who are nicer. But only a tiny, tiny
few who are richer.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>